Junkins DHASUWT Hair Dryer Brushes Recall (September 2026)
Serious Injury or Death from Electrocution, and Shock hazard — about 1,738 units.
| What | Junkins DHASUWT Hair Dryer Brushes |
|---|---|
| How many | About 1,738 units |
| The hazard | The recalled hair dryer brushes lack an integrated immersion protection device, which presents a substantial product hazard to consumers, posing the risk of death or serious injury from electrocution or shock if the hair dryers fall into water while plugged in to an electrical source. The recalled hair dryer brushes also pose the risk of death or serious injury from smoking and fire hazards. |
| Sold at | Sold At: Amazon.com from October 2024 through June 2026 for about $27 · Shenzhen Weihua Chenyu Technology Co., Ltd, dba Junkins, of China |
| Remedy | Consumers should unplug and stop using the recalled hair dryers immediately and contact Junkins to receive a full refund. Consumers will be asked to cut the power cord and provide a photo of the destroyed product to [email protected]. |
| Contact | Junkins at [email protected]. |
| Recall date | 2026-09-10 (recall no. 26750) |

What was recalled
This recall involves DHASUWT Hair Dryer and Blow Dryer Brush in 1, Negative Ion Hair Dryer Brush, 1Step Ionic Hair Straightener Brush Hair Dryer Hot Air Brush, Hair Styling Tool Straightening Dryer, with model number XR-8801. The hair dryers are black hot air dryer paddle brushes with a pink design and brush bristles. There are three heat settings on the hair dryers. The top of the product packaging is labeled XRUI with the model name XR-8801.
What to do
Stop using the product. The listed remedy is: Consumers should unplug and stop using the recalled hair dryers immediately and contact Junkins to receive a full refund. Consumers will be asked to cut the power cord and provide a photo of the destroyed product to [email protected].. Junkins at [email protected].
Source: the official CPSC recall notice, published 2026-09-10. Every fact on this page comes from that notice — if anything here disagrees with it, the notice wins.