Yamazuki Youth All-Terrain Vehicles (ATVs) Recall (June 2026)
Serious Injury or Death from Crash — about About 200 units.
| What | Yamazuki Youth All-Terrain Vehicles (ATVs) |
|---|---|
| How many | About About 200 units |
| The hazard | The recalled youth ATVs violate the mandatory safety standard for ATVs because they are missing brake lights, reducing visibility of the youth ATV to other vehicles, posing a deadly crash hazard. |
| Sold at | Online at Amazon.com and Walmart.com from October 2025 through December 2025 for between $500 and $600. |
| Remedy | Consumers should stop using the recalled youth ATVs immediately and contact Yamazuki for a free repair kit. |
| Contact | Yamazuki at 626-420-6433 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. PT Monday through Friday, email at [email protected], or online at https://yamazukipowersports.com/pages/recall or https://yamazukipowersports.com/and click "Recall" at the top of the page for more information. |
| Recall date | 2026-06-25 (recall no. 26574) |

What was recalled
This recall involves XW-A17 Electric Youth ATVs sold under brand names including Sunderwell in blue, green, orange and pink. "Model:XW-A17" is printed on the identification plate located on the front left side of the frame column. "Yamazuki, Inc. certifies that this ATV complies with ANSI/SVIA 1-2023 Standard. "This ATV is subject to the Yamazuki, Inc. ATV Action Plan filed with and approved by the U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission" is also printed on the identification plate.
What to do
Stop using the product. The listed remedy is: Consumers should stop using the recalled youth ATVs immediately and contact Yamazuki for a free repair kit.. Yamazuki at 626-420-6433 from 9 a.m. to 5 p.m. PT Monday through Friday, email at [email protected], or online at https://yamazukipowersports.com/pages/recall or https://yamazukipowersports.com/and click "Recall" at the top of the page for more information.
Source: the official CPSC recall notice, published 2026-06-25. Every fact on this page comes from that notice — if anything here disagrees with it, the notice wins.